|
|
|
|
|
|
Most podcasters do not sit down one day and decide to create an enormous workflow.
It happens gradually.
You start with recording and publishing. Then you add clips because clips seem important. You start making video. You add a newsletter, transcripts, social posts, guest follow-ups, analytics, YouTube, a booking system and perhaps a few AI tools that promise to make some of this easier.
Guests can end up in the same place. A few podcast pitches turn into a spreadsheet, a one-sheet, follow-up emails, research, social posts for every appearance, clips, another database and a new tool to help manage all of it.
Some of those additions are genuinely worthwhile. The problem is that when things start feeling busy, our instinct is often to add something else to fix them.
|
|
|
|
We are surprisingly good at adding things
|
|
|
|
A 2021 study published in Nature looked at how people approach improvement across eight experiments. The researchers found that people were much more likely to look for ways to add something than to consider whether removing something might produce a better result. Simply prompting people to consider subtraction made them more likely to spot those options.
That feels very familiar in podcasting.
Editing taking too long? Find another tool.
Promotion feeling difficult? Add another platform.
Guest outreach getting messy? Add another system.
Not enough time? Find an automation.
Sometimes the new thing is exactly what you need. But today, let's ignore that option for a moment and look in the other direction first.
Before adding anything else, take what you already do around your podcast and run it through three steps.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Question: Is this worth the time it takes, and is the current way of doing it working?
If the answer is yes, leave it alone.
Maybe your newsletter consistently brings people back to new episodes. Maybe personally following up with guests has led to repeat appearances and referrals. Perhaps video really does help people discover your show.
It does not have to directly make money to earn its place. It might save you time later, strengthen relationships, improve discovery or simply be a part of podcasting you enjoy.
The important thing is that you know why you are doing it.
If the answer is clear and the effort feels reasonable, keep it.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Question: Is this worth doing, but does it keep interrupting everything else?
This is different from Step 1.
The problem is not the task. The problem is how often you have to switch into it.
Episode descriptions, guest outreach, social posts, graphics, scheduling, research, analytics and admin can all break up a week when you deal with them one at a time as they appear.
There is research outside podcasting that gives us some support here. In one experiment, people who checked email only a few times each day reported lower daily stress than when they checked without limits. Later workplace research on email batching also found fewer interruptions and some short-term reductions in emotional exhaustion, although the researchers were careful to point out that batching is not useful in every situation.
Nobody has run a study proving that writing three podcast descriptions on Tuesday is scientifically superior to writing them separately. But the broader point about reducing unnecessary interruptions makes sense here.
So if something matters but keeps dragging you into a different mode, try grouping it.
Write several descriptions together. Schedule a few posts at once. Deal with outreach in one sitting. Look properly at your podcast numbers once a month rather than checking them every morning.
The task stays.
You just stop letting it interrupt you constantly.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Question: Am I actually sure this is still worth doing?
This is where the method changes.
If something clearly belongs in Keep, keep it.
If it clearly has value but would be easier grouped together, batch it.
But if you cannot confidently put it into either category, do not immediately look for a faster way to do it.
Pause it.
Maybe you make three clips for every episode because you started doing that two years ago. Maybe you still post on a platform that rarely sends anyone back to your show. Perhaps your show notes have gradually become huge, or you spend an hour making graphics because that has simply become part of publishing day.
The temptation is to optimise those things.
Find a faster clipping tool. Automate the posts. Build another template.
But first, give yourself a chance to find out whether the thing deserves saving.
|
|
|
|
After the pause, choose one of three outcomes
|
|
|
|
This is where simplifying comes in. It is not really a separate category at the beginning because you often do not know what the simpler version should be yet.
Pause first. Then look at what happened.
RESTORE IT
You stopped doing it and realised it genuinely mattered. Bring it back.
SIMPLIFY IT
Some of it mattered, but the old version took far more time than the result justified.
Three clips might become one. Five social platforms might become two. Huge show notes might become a short summary with the links listeners actually need. A complicated guest follow-up sequence might become one thoughtful email.
STOP IT
You paused it and… nothing much happened.
Nobody missed it. Your podcast did not collapse. The opportunities did not disappear.
Perhaps it does not need to come back.
That is why pausing can be more revealing than simply deciding you should “work smarter.” It gives you something real to judge.
|
|
|
|
So when do we try new stuff?
|
|
|
|
Only now do we get back to the new tools.
Because we are definitely not suggesting that podcasters should stop experimenting.
There are some genuinely useful tools appearing for editing, research, transcripts, outreach, promotion and all the boring admin around producing a show.
But trying something new takes time too.
You have to set it up, learn it, change part of your routine and then use it for long enough to know whether it is actually helping.
Instead of adding the new tool first and hoping it creates some breathing room, create the breathing room first.
Then experiment.
You will have more time to learn the tool, more energy to use it properly and a much better idea of what problem you actually want it to solve.
The method, in one place
1. KEEP
It matters, it works and the effort feels reasonable.
2. BATCH
It matters, but it interrupts you too often. Group it together.
3. PAUSE & REASSESS
You are not sure the result still justifies the time. Stop temporarily and see what changes.
After the pause: RESTORE / SIMPLIFY / STOP
Then — and only then —
4. EXPERIMENT
Now look at the new tool, platform or idea you have been wanting to try.
|
|
|
|
Make room before you add more
|
|
|
|
Podcasting will not run out of new things for us to try.
There will always be another platform, feature, AI tool, promotion idea or supposedly essential thing we could add to the routine.
Some of them will be worth it.
But improvement does not always mean adding something.
Sometimes it means noticing that a task has been following you around for two years without anyone asking whether it still deserves to be there.
Keep what is working. Batch what keeps interrupting you. Pause what you are unsure about and let the result tell you what comes back.
Then you have room for the new stuff that might actually be worth trying.
Happy Collaborating,
__
The Podcast Collaborative Team Ready to ride the wave of podcasting's biggest year yet?Come check out the Podcast Collab Club and connect with creators who are making it happen!
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ready to start taking the guesswork out of finding great guests and the legwork out of landing aligned interviews?
|
|
|
|
|
The Podcast Collaborative
Mansfield, CT 06268, USA
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
