The AAWAA Women’s Advocate
The AAWAA Women’s Advocate
Podcast Description
Advocating for the protection and advancement of Australian women and girls in areas where we are vulnerable on the basis of our sex.This podcast provides general information and opinion only and does not constitute legal advice. Listeners should seek independent, professional legal advice before acting on any matters discussed. The hosts and AAWAA accept no liability for decisions made based on this content.
Podcast Insights
Content Themes
The podcast covers a range of topics centered on women's rights and protections in Australia, including legal analyses of systemic issues like the impact of removing sex definitions from legislation, gender healthcare for minors, and local activism stories. Episodes like 'Unintended chaos: The legal fallout of two missing words' and 'Revolutionising gender care: A call for comprehensive change' emphasize current legal challenges and advocates' perspectives.

AAWAA is a national peak advocacy body and independent media outlet. The AAWAA Women's Advocate works for the protection and advancement of Australian women and girls in areas where we are vulnerable on the basis of our sex.
This podcast provides general information and opinion only and does not constitute legal advice. Listeners should seek independent, professional legal advice before acting on any matters discussed. The hosts and AAWAA accept no liability for decisions made based on this content.
__
Donate
If you wish to donate to AAWAA you can do so by making a direct deposit or bank transfer to:
- Account name: Affiliation of Australian Women’s Advocacy Alliances
- Account number: 04201471
- BSB: 325-185
__
Disclosure statement
Voices in this podcast are AI-generated clones of real, named AAWAA members, created and used with their informed consent to help amplify women's words and stories. All scripts and spoken content are written by AAWAA women, and all editorial judgement, fact-checking, and production decisions remain entirely human. AI is used only to voice this content: never to generate, alter, or invent what is said. Learn more at womensadvocacy.net.
The Australian Law Reform Commission told stakeholders its surrogacy review was nearly complete. Days earlier, it had quietly been given six more weeks — and nobody will say why. In this episode, Amber and Emma trace two episodes eight months apart: a roundtable where governance concerns were redirected to private correspondence, and a deadline extension the ALRC's own newsletter never mentioned. They discuss what the Advisory Committee's composition tells us about access and influence, why "workload" isn't an explanation, and why AAWAA keeps asking questions institutions would rather answer privately, or not at all. Full correspondence discussed in this episode is published at womensadvocacy.net.
This podcast provides general information and opinion only and does not constitute legal advice. Listeners should seek independent, professional legal advice before acting on any matters discussed. The hosts and AAWAA accept no liability for decisions made based on this content.

Disclaimer
This podcast’s information is provided for general reference and was obtained from publicly accessible sources. The Podcast Collaborative neither produces nor verifies the content, accuracy, or suitability of this podcast. Views and opinions belong solely to the podcast creators and guests.
For a complete disclaimer, please see our Full Disclaimer on the archive page. The Podcast Collaborative bears no responsibility for the podcast’s themes, language, or overall content. Listener discretion is advised. Read our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy for more details.