Parsing the Truth: One Byte at a Time
Parsing the Truth: One Byte at a Time
Podcast Description
Former FBI senior forensic examiners Becky Passmore and Stacy Eldridge dive into the world of digital forensics—one byte at a time. Now running their own firms and teaching the next wave of cyber sleuths, they share real-world case insights, expert tips, and a sharp sense of humor. From computer and iPhone forensics to ransomware attacks, this podcast unpacks how digital evidence solves modern crimes. Perfect for cybersecurity pros, students, and true crime techies. Join us as we Parse the Truth, One Byte at a Time.
Podcast Insights
Content Themes
Focuses on digital forensics with content exploring real-life case studies, investigative techniques, and industry challenges. Episodes include topics like the BTK killer case, the emotional toll of forensic examination, and practical advice for aspiring digital forensic examiners.
Former FBI senior forensic examiners Becky Passmore and Stacy Eldridge dive into the world of digital forensics—one byte at a time. Now running their own firms and teaching the next wave of cyber sleuths, they share real-world case insights, expert tips, and a sharp sense of humor. From computer and iPhone forensics to ransomware attacks, this podcast unpacks how digital evidence solves modern crimes. Perfect for cybersecurity pros, students, and true crime techies. Join us as we Parse the Truth, One Byte at a Time.
We focus on how digital evidence is used to find facts in today’s crimes.
Deepfakes are everywhere, and determining the Provenance of digital evidence is more important and challenging than ever before. Lars Daniel joins us to discuss the steps digital forensic examiners can take in their next case.
Special Guest: Lars Daniel
Connect with Lars:
https://www.thelarsdaniel.com/
https://www.linkedin.com/in/larsdaniel/
Support the podcast https://patreon.com/parsingthetruth
About this Episode
Stacy Eldridge and Becky Passmore talk with Lars about the growing risk of AI generated evidence, why screenshots and consumer device media are increasingly unreliable on their own, and why provenance now has to be treated as a core evidentiary issue.The conversation focuses on how examiners, attorneys, judges, insurers, and law enforcement can respond before fake media becomes routine in litigation and investigations.
Key topics
- In this episode, Lars explains how his work in trucking and accident investigations led him into the deeper problem of AI manipulated media and digital evidence triage.
- He breaks down the practical categories he uses with counsel and claims professionals:
- He describes the business case for a layered review process: automated screening, human review, then a digital forensics expert when litigation is possible.
- The discussion emphasizes that the best way to prove authenticity is still to return to the original device and source evidence whenever possible.
- Lars warns that consumer device evidence often arrives with weak or no provenance, unlike enterprise systems that may have stronger built in controls.
- The hosts and Lars discuss how deep fake claims may become a litigation tactic, forcing the other side to spend time and money disproving authenticity even when the evidence is real.
- He explains the liar’s dividend and why it can be used not just as a defense, but as a strategy to raise costs and create uncertainty.
- A recent civil case example shows how a manipulated video, including added water to suggest a slip and fall, was initially treated as real until deeper analysis raised questions.
- Lars stresses that examiners need to stay in their lane, know when to refer specialized work, and avoid claiming expertise across every digital forensics niche.
Listeners will learn
- How deep fakes, shallow fakes, and enhancement differ
- Why screenshots are no longer enough to trust digital evidence
- How to build a layered authenticity review process
- Why provenance matters in legal and investigative settings
- When to return to the original device for verification
Disclaimer
This podcast’s information is provided for general reference and was obtained from publicly accessible sources. The Podcast Collaborative neither produces nor verifies the content, accuracy, or suitability of this podcast. Views and opinions belong solely to the podcast creators and guests.
For a complete disclaimer, please see our Full Disclaimer on the archive page. The Podcast Collaborative bears no responsibility for the podcast’s themes, language, or overall content. Listener discretion is advised. Read our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy for more details.