Michael Liebreich has spent decades working on climate solutions. He's also one of the sharpest critics of how the climate community argues its case.In the final part of this three-episode series, recorded at Rick's off-grid cabin above Oslo, the conversation turns to the narratives shaping the climate debate — and why getting them wrong damages the very cause they're meant to serve.In this episode:

• Why scientists should present options — not tell society what to do
• The Bjorn Lomborg question — smart, data-driven, and yet persistently misleading
• Why the RCP 8.5 climate scenario was never plausible — and why using it handed ammunition to climate sceptics
• What the IPCC's own data actually says about extreme weather events
• Why being ”disagreeably honest” — about both sides of the debate — is the only robust strategy

🎧 Parts 1 and 2 are live now — start from the beginning for the full picture! 🛎️ Tap follow so you don't miss the next episode.🔗 Find us everywhere: 🌐 systems7.co 💼 LinkedIn: https://shorturl.at/Eu0wY ▶️ YouTube: https://shorturl.at/KTCwj 🎧 Spotify: https://shorturl.at/HsVlW 🍏 Apple Podcasts: https://shorturl.at/deldU#WTFNow

#MichaelLiebreich#EnergyTransition#ClimatePragmatism#BloombergNEF#ClimateAction#ClimateNarrative#Science#Leadership#NordicLeadership#Geopolitics#Sustainability