The Archery Project
The Archery Project
Podcast Description
Welcome to The Archery Project where we sit down and have raw, unfiltered conversations discussing archery and bowhunting adventures in depth through the perspectives of unique individuals from all different backgrounds.If you enjoy the show be sure to subscribe to show your support!
Podcast Insights
Content Themes
The podcast focuses on themes of personal evolution in bowhunting, conservation efforts, and technical discussions on traditional archery. Episode examples include discussions on strategic hunting approaches, fitness transformations for hunters, and effective turkey hunting tactics, emphasizing the importance of patience and strategy.

All archery all the time. Your go to archery and bowhunting podcast.
Bowhunting has a problem: we argue about arrow builds like it’s personal philosophy, then we expect broadheads to land true when the shot is rushed, the footing is bad, and the wind is doing what it wants. The 2026 Arrow Ballistic Study is the cleanest attempt I’ve seen to replace that noise with real measurements using a precision shooting machine, Doppler radar, chronographs, and an independent acoustic chamber, then sorting the results with regression analysis so we can separate what actually matters.
We walk through what they tested and why it’s credible, then translate the big concepts into plain language: drag (trajectory and wind drift), lift recovery (how fast the arrow corrects after a bad launch), and accuracy at 70 yards with both field points and broadheads. On broadheads, the data again favors mechanicals for aerodynamic forgiveness, while fixed blades show a measurable flight penalty that gets worse when the human element shows up. We also talk about speed, because the high-speed testing suggests fast setups do not automatically pay a big accuracy tax if the components are solid.
Then we get into the surprise most hunters overlook: sound. Broadheads and vanes were measured the way deer hear them, and the results point to a “system” mindset where broadhead design and vane choice work together. Finally, we introduce the new FOC protocol and the headline finding: higher FOC predicts tighter broadhead groups, with the real limits coming from dynamic spine and trajectory, not accuracy falling apart.
If you want to build a quieter, more forgiving, more accurate hunting arrow with less guesswork, listen through and then go explore the linked data for yourself. Subscribe for part two, share this with a buddy who’s rebuilding arrows right now, and leave a review. What are you shooting for broadheads and what FOC are you running today?
See James Yates article on the study here: https://westernhunter.net/information/the-2026-arrow-ballistics-study-results/
See the interactive data from Precision Cut Archery here: https://www.precisioncutarchery.com/research/arrow-study-2026
🏹 Shop Extreme Outfitters for all of your archery & bowhunting needs: https://extremeoutfitters.com
Use code ARCHERYPROJECT to save 10%
Quick reads, pro tips, and the latest episodes—delivered straight to your inbox every week.
👉 Sign up here: https://thearcheryproject.com/
✅ Watch the video podcast here!
https://www.youtube.com/@thearcheryproject
JOIN OUR COMMUNITY:
► Facebook: http://bit.ly/44UD7Vo
► Instagram: http://bit.ly/40Q2jLf

Disclaimer
This podcast’s information is provided for general reference and was obtained from publicly accessible sources. The Podcast Collaborative neither produces nor verifies the content, accuracy, or suitability of this podcast. Views and opinions belong solely to the podcast creators and guests.
For a complete disclaimer, please see our Full Disclaimer on the archive page. The Podcast Collaborative bears no responsibility for the podcast’s themes, language, or overall content. Listener discretion is advised. Read our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy for more details.