Unwritten Law

Unwritten Law
Podcast Description
Unwritten Law is a podcast hosted by Mark Chenoweth and John Vecchione, brought to you by the New Civil Liberties Alliance (NCLA). This show dives deep into the world of unlawful administrative power, exposing how bureaucrats operate outside the bounds of written law through informal guidance, regulatory “dark matter,” and unconstitutional agency overreach.
Podcast Insights
Content Themes
The podcast focuses on topics related to administrative law, constitutional rights, and legal challenges against government overreach. Episodes cover themes such as the constitutionality of vaccine mandates, the IRS's warrantless searches of financial records, and the implications of a case against the National Park Service’s regulations. Specific episode examples include discussions on Health Freedom Defense Fund v. Carvalho, Harper v. IRS, and the implications of Loper Bright and Relentless rulings on agency power.

Unwritten Law is a podcast hosted by Mark Chenoweth and John Vecchione, brought to you by the New Civil Liberties Alliance (NCLA). This show dives deep into the world of unlawful administrative power, exposing how bureaucrats operate outside the bounds of written law through informal guidance, regulatory “dark matter,” and unconstitutional agency overreach.

In this episode of Unwritten Law, NCLA’s Mark Chenoweth and John Vecchione are joined by attorney Margot Cleveland to expose the State Department’s role in funding and promoting censorship technologies. They discuss NCLA’s case The Daily Wire v. State Department, including how federal dollars helped target and suppress domestic speech through outfits like NewsGuard and the now-defunct Global Engagement Center. The conversation unpacks bombshell revelations from Senator Marco Rubio—who disclosed that the State Department kept files labeling Americans as “vectors of disinformation.” Margot also explains how so-called “media literacy” grants are being misused to discredit U.S. voices and why a consent decree is needed to ensure bureaucrats don’t reboot this censorship agenda under a new name.
Disclaimer
This podcast’s information is provided for general reference and was obtained from publicly accessible sources. The Podcast Collaborative neither produces nor verifies the content, accuracy, or suitability of this podcast. Views and opinions belong solely to the podcast creators and guests.
For a complete disclaimer, please see our Full Disclaimer on the archive page. The Podcast Collaborative bears no responsibility for the podcast’s themes, language, or overall content. Listener discretion is advised. Read our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy for more details.