Normal Curves: Sexy Science, Serious Statistics

Normal Curves: Sexy Science, Serious Statistics
Podcast Description
Normal Curves is a podcast about sexy science & serious statistics. Ever try to make sense of a scientific study and the numbers behind it? Listen in to a lively conversation between two stats-savvy friends who break it all down with humor and clarity. Professors Regina Nuzzo of Gallaudet University and Kristin Sainani of Stanford University discuss academic papers journal club-style — except with more fun, less jargon, and some irreverent, PG-13 content sprinkled in. Join Kristin and Regina as they dissect the data, challenge the claims, and arm you with tools to assess scientific studies on your own.
Podcast Insights
Content Themes
The podcast centers around the intersection of science and statistics, delving into topics such as the interpretation of scientific studies, statistical methodologies, and the implications of research findings, with episode examples including critiques of recent medical studies and discussions on how to understand p-values and confidence intervals.

Normal Curves is a podcast about sexy science & serious statistics. Ever try to make sense of a scientific study and the numbers behind it? Listen in to a lively conversation between two stats-savvy friends who break it all down with humor and clarity. Professors Regina Nuzzo of Gallaudet University and Kristin Sainani of Stanford University discuss academic papers journal club-style — except with more fun, less jargon, and some irreverent, PG-13 content sprinkled in. Join Kristin and Regina as they dissect the data, challenge the claims, and arm you with tools to assess scientific studies on your own.
Wear red and drive men wild with lust – or so says scientific research on color’s role in human mating. But can a simple color swap really boost a woman’s hotness score? In this episode, we delve into the evidence behind the Red Dress Effect, from a controversial first study in college men to what the latest research says about who this trick might work for (and who it might not). Along the way we encounter red monkey butts, old-Internet websites, the Winner’s Curse in scientific research, adversarial collaborations, and why size (ahem, sample size) really does matter.
Statistical topics
- Reproducibility crisis in psychology
- Sample size
- Selection bias
- Winner’s curse
- Cohen’s d standardized effect size
- Adversarial collaboration
- Meta-analysis
- Preregistration
- Publication bias
- Statistical moderators
Methodological morals
“The smaller the sample, the flashier the result, the less you should trust it.”
“Good scientists learn from their statistical mistakes and fix them.”
References
- Clarke, G. How to Be Sexy: 7 Weird (But True) Rules of Attraction. Allure. January 23, 2013.
- Nuzzo, R. Vying for a soul mate? Psych out the competition with science. Los Angeles Times. December 8, 2008.
- Vying for a Soul Mate on the Today Show, December 30, 2008.
- Elliot, A.J. and Niesta, D. Romantic red: red enhances men’s attraction to women. Journal of personality and social psychology. 2008; 95: 1150 – 1164.
- Lehrer, J. The Truth Wears Off. TheNew Yorker, December 5, 2010.
- MacMahon, B., Yen, S., Trichopoulos, D., Warren, K. and Nardi, G. Coffee and cancer of the pancreas. New England Journal of Medicine. 1981; 304: 630-633.
- Ioannidis, J.P. Why most published research findings are false. PLoS medicine. 2005; 2(8), e124
- Lehmann, G.K., Elliot, A.J. and Calin-Jageman, R.J. Meta-analysis of the effect of red on perceived attractiveness. Evolutionary Psychology. 2018; 16: 1474704918802412.
- Pazda, A.D., Thorstenson, C.A. and Elliot, A.J. The effect of red on attractiveness for highly attractive women. Curr Psychol. 2023; 42: 8066–8073
Kristin and Regina’s online courses:
Demystifying Data: A Modern Approach to Statistical Understanding
Clinical Trials: Design, Strategy, and Analysis
Medical Statistics Certificate Program
Epidemiology and Clinical Research Graduate Certificate Program
Chapters
- (00:00) – Introduction
- (06:04) – Red Dress Effect on TV
- (10:01) – Red Monkey Butts
- (12:56) – 2008 Study on Romantic Red
- (16:04) – HotOrNot.com
- (20:10) – 2008 Study Results
- (25:10) – Cohen’s d Standardized Effect Size
- (30:52) – Problems with Small Sample Sizes
- (34:12) – Winner’s Curse and Publication Bias
- (38:40) – Reproducibility Crisis
- (44:03) – Adversarial Collaboration
- (49:01) – Meta-Analysis and Pre-Registration
- (55:23) – Adversarial Discussion Sections and Updates
- (01:02:55) – Latest Red Study
- (01:06:26) – Wrap-Up

Disclaimer
This podcast’s information is provided for general reference and was obtained from publicly accessible sources. The Podcast Collaborative neither produces nor verifies the content, accuracy, or suitability of this podcast. Views and opinions belong solely to the podcast creators and guests.
For a complete disclaimer, please see our Full Disclaimer on the archive page. The Podcast Collaborative bears no responsibility for the podcast’s themes, language, or overall content. Listener discretion is advised. Read our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy for more details.