Picking Justice
Picking Justice
Podcast Description
Attention Trial Lawyers: You’ve meticulously crafted your opening statement, mastered your directs and crosses, and fine-tuned your closing argument. But have you developed a strategy for jury selection? What will you do when a potential juror gives an unexpected answer? Do you even want that person on your jury? The clock is ticking — you need to think fast.
Introducing Picking Justice, the essential podcast for trial lawyers. Join nationally renowned jury consultant Harry Plotkin and leading trial lawyer Dan Kramer as they guide you through the complex art of jury selection.
Harry and Dan share invaluable insights and real-world strategies, breaking down the myths and misconceptions that often hold lawyers back in the courtroom.
Whether you’re a seasoned litigator or preparing for your first big case, Picking Justice offers expert guidance to help you make smarter choices during jury selection.
Subscribe today and elevate your trial skills with Picking Justice.
Podcast Insights
Content Themes
The podcast focuses on key topics surrounding jury selection strategies, potential biases, and courtroom tactics. Specific episodes explore themes like common sense approaches to picking jurors, transforming negative juror perceptions into strengths, and the unexpected challenges faced during jury selection, providing listeners with actionable advice and real-world examples.
Attention Trial Lawyers: You’ve meticulously crafted your opening statement, mastered your directs and crosses, and fine-tuned your closing argument. But have you developed a strategy for jury selection? What will you do when a potential juror gives an unexpected answer? Do you even want that person on your jury? The clock is ticking — you need to think fast.
Introducing Picking Justice, the essential podcast for trial lawyers. Join nationally renowned jury consultant Harry Plotkin and leading trial lawyer Dan Kramer as they guide you through the complex art of jury selection.
Harry and Dan share invaluable insights and real-world strategies, breaking down the myths and misconceptions that often hold lawyers back in the courtroom.
Whether you’re a seasoned litigator or preparing for your first big case, Picking Justice offers expert guidance to help you make smarter choices during jury selection.
Subscribe today and elevate your trial skills with Picking Justice.
A juror who says they won’t award money for pain and suffering only becomes a cause challenge if that answer holds up when the judge or defense tries to rehabilitate them. Steve Vartazarian, founder of The Vartazarian Law Firm, shares with hosts Harry Plotkin and Dan Kramer the simple questions he uses to lock those jurors in, and why he stops short of pushing them too far. He also explains why he welcomes jurors’ worst answers, why he calls it “human harm” instead of pain and suffering, and the one line about damages that jurors love to hear. Tune in for jury selection techniques to use in your next voir dire.
Learn More and Connect
☑️ Steve Vartazarian | LinkedIn
☑️ The Vartazarian Law Firm | LinkedIn | Facebook
☑️ Harry Plotkin | LinkedIn | Facebook | Instagram
☑️ Dan Kramer | LinkedIn
☑️ Kramer Trial Lawyers onLinkedIn | Facebook | YouTube | Instagram
☑️ Subscribe: Apple Podcasts | Spotify | YouTube
Produced and Powered by LawPods
Disclaimer
This podcast’s information is provided for general reference and was obtained from publicly accessible sources. The Podcast Collaborative neither produces nor verifies the content, accuracy, or suitability of this podcast. Views and opinions belong solely to the podcast creators and guests.
For a complete disclaimer, please see our Full Disclaimer on the archive page. The Podcast Collaborative bears no responsibility for the podcast’s themes, language, or overall content. Listener discretion is advised. Read our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy for more details.